You know, liek, the mitichloridians or whatever culd have, liek, made Leia "remember" Padme's essence, and stuff, because she has some Force powers. Liek how those psychiatrists make ppl "remember" things, when they werent true, stuff liek molestions from theyre daddies. Cuz the Force is awesomely strange liek that.
Sadly, all this talk of midichlorians and molestation reminds me of that gag 'fic somebody wrote about Qui-Gon and a nine-year-old Anakin. :\
2006-03-23 06:18 pm (UTC)
ok that made no sense so i'm reposting it. :X
Because hey, movie-canon doesn't quite match up with movie-canon.
Yes, yes, a thousand times YES-
I mean, waitaminute. WHAAaa? But I thought George was GOD? 'Cause like, only GOD could convince the masses that what they saw in theaters NEVER HAPPENED and still make them shower money on him decade after decade with ETERNAL LOYALTY and worship, and WITHOUT QUESTION (even the pope doesn't have that kind of power, yo). So like, what am I supposed to do with my Lucas Altar now?
Turn it into a toilet? *sniffle-sob*
Yes! The sun does not shine directly out of George Lucas' asshole AND I'M OKAY WITH THAT.
It's true. It actually eminates from his belly button.
I have never understood the reason to draw a line between the two, it's nice to know I'm not the only one.
They all have their good and bad points
I still contend that the idea of fictional fact is yet another in a long line of fandom-related oxymorons. I tend to look at the opportunities the gaps in logic give our imaginations - we'll always have to fill in pieces ourselves, if we are bothered enough to do so. In fact, I think we were meant to, by the mere fact that for George Lucas to have done all of our thinking for us is for him to have made 6 movies about trivial minutia. We can work out the smaller details ourselves, and when we have, it won't mean much other than nudging some unimportant nuance into place. But it's still fiction, as ethereal and satisfying as the ghost of yesterday's burrito del grande.
mmm...burrito del grande...with beans..
I'll be back.
Here via jedi_news ... just had to say, omg yes. Word. Totally.
Nice little rant for me to agree with, and Quinlan Vos was shagging a seven foot tall green rabbit before his mind-wipe, so there. Because nobody said he wasn't.
Right, right; it's uh, in one of the Clone Wars comics somewhere, I think.
(Somebody try telling that to George "I edit all my movies and the original Original Trilogy will NEVER SEE THE LIGHT OF DAY ON DVD BWAHAHAHAHA" Lucas, though.)
Which Original Original Trilogy is that? The one that initially played in theaters, or the one that was available on tape and laserdisc for years? Lucas has tinkered with these flicks from Day One. Of course, people insist that enhancing the sound or color or picture of a movie is not the same thing as the SE changes that they throw gigantic tantrums over. I say, change is change.
Anyway -- I agree with a lot of what you said. I am not an especial fan of the EU, but there are some EU works that I like, or at least enjoy. However, I am a purist in that I do not believe that the EU can override the movies, which many EU fans seem to believe: "Vader wasn't a good strategist -- Zahn said so in 'Heir to the Empire'!" or "That no-marriage rule for Jedi isn't valid -- Ki Adi Mundi was shown to have multiple wives in such-and-such EU novel!" or "Darth isn't a Sith title -- Exar Kun wasn't called 'Darth'!"
A good friend of mine once said to me: "I've never seen someone who loves Star Wars so much who can rip into it with such unbridled glee."
The simple fact is this: Just because you're a fan of something (no matter how hardcore you might be), does not make it good.
Bravo to you, Jess.
Star Wars is one of those fandoms where large chunks of the fanbase mock because we love. :p
Oh Star Wars. The fandom where the ability to go "LALALA NEVER HAPPENED!" to any given piece of confusing canon is a survival skill to avoid head explosions. :p
That deserves to be an icon.
Sticking my neck into the fray...
Here is what's canon for me:
The Original Trilogy, pre-Special Edition.
The Thrawn Trilogy novels by Zahn
Also, the X-Wing novels are damn good (and funny), and I will take them as canon if they don't contradict anything in the above. But I can't remember if they do or not, thus this disclaimer.
Also, possibly other books by Zahn, but I've not read any of them recently enough to remember the details.
And that, dear friends, is it. No prequels, no Yuuzhan Vong, nada.
Hey, my canon is:
- The versions of the original trilogy I first saw
- Brian Daley's Han Solo trilogy
Everything else is varying shades of (often very enjoyable) alternity, thus enabling me to enjoy six mutually contradictory things before breakfast. ^_^
Wow. It's rare to see someone who admits s/he isn't a "canon nazi". Btw I'm totally agreeing with you! :)
Midiclorians made me want to bleach my brain but fortunately even Lucas forgot them between episode I & II. :D But I still love the StarWars <3